Monday, 14 May 2012

To Begin to Understand, you must Experience.



We’ve all read the books, we’ve all seen the movies, we’ve all done it, we all think we know all there is to know. But can you ever truly know, without experiencing it

The mountains are ever changing; they will never be the same as they where the day, the moment before the moment you are in them. Stay with me now, this will all come together as more than a ramble. What I am talking about is experiential learning in the mountains.

Experiential learning is the idea that learning is not a fixed element, but something that is formed and re-formed through experience. (Kolb, 1984) Cited in Kolb (1984) Piaget states, “no two thoughts are ever the same, since experience always intervenes.” (Piaget, 1970)

Experiential learning is at the heart of all adventure education, one could even go so far as to say it is the basis of all learning. When looking at my own experiences (see the word is here again!) I can see clearly now how only with greatly varied experiences in the mountains, can I progress to greater learning and understanding of the mountains.

This thought was brought home to me after my Mountain Leader training in the Lake District. Having gone for training I felt fairly confident in my leading ability and my knowledge of the mountains. However on the expedition, I felt that I crossed a line in my experience, where only that experience can lead me closer to understanding.

 It all took place on the last night coming off Crinkle Crags into the darkness in worsening weather, we began to look for a suitable place to camp, pre-expedition knowledge was that there was a good spot by Angle Tarn, the assumption was ‘it’s always pretty much sheltered’. As we made camp the weather went all out, with gale force winds battering us into are quickly erected tents.

The night brought weather I have never experienced, low temps, howling winds and a constant downpour of rain. During the night most of the group experienced tent brakeage and some even mild hypothermia.
Could this all have seemed from our assumption of the camp site as a ‘safe’ camping spot, or a lack of experience? I know that myself, the experience of that night will never lead me to think anywhere is a ‘safe’ camp spot again. I endeavour in future to listen to myself and my experiences, to learn from them and be assertive enough to say no to intellectual assumptions of safety, for my experiences will be my only true understanding of safety for me, my group and my abilities.

This is because I will have had gone through the processes in Kolb’s theory of experiential learning, leading me to learn for myself about my own learning.






To conclude I wonder whether you can ever learn about the mountains and leading in the mountains from anywhere but leading in mountains.

References:
 
Kolb, D, (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Piaget, J, (1952) The Origins of Intelligence in Children. New York: Basic Books.

Friday, 9 December 2011

Changing Teaching Styles and Leadership


Another moment, on which I have reflected upon, was on the Carnedd’s in Snowdonia. The area in which I am reflecting on was teaching navigation to my group. On departure we set off from the mini bus, and I was hoping to set the group sections to navigate along the route. Having made a route card the previous evening after consulting the group, I thought that this would be perfectly achievable.

However I was under the assumption that the group had been navigating previously with another leader. This was soon proven wrong to me as we set off, as three members of the group had done little to no navigation previously. This left me with the task of teaching them from scratch upon the mountain, causing my timing of the route to be far out.

As I began to teach I realised that I would have to use a range of teaching styles to convey the information. Looking at Mosston and Ashworth’s teaching style spectrum (1986) we can see how there are many different teaching styles which are all useful in different situations.

 
A.)   Command Style
B.)    Practice Style
C.)    Reciprocal Style
D.)   Self-Check Style
E.)    Inclusion Style
F.)    Guided Discovery Style
G.)   Divergent Style
H.)   Individual Program/ Learner’s Design
I.)      Learner Initiated
J.)     Self Teaching Style

Moving from the styles A-E, I managed to teach basic navigation to the group, however it took me most of the day reflecting as we went to start to using all the styles.  I found that to begin with I was using more of the command and practice style, but as we progressed I began to use more of the reciprocal, self check and inclusion styles. 

This in turn made me subconsciously change my leadership style (Lewin, 1930) from a more delegative/participative style where the group would of had more control over their own outcomes to a more authoritarian/ participative style. Where I gave more instructions and had to increase my authority on points of navigation. Because of all the time spent navigating we where two hours later than my route card had suggested are time of arrival would be.

From looking at how this day went in future I feel I should have been more aware that this may have become an issue for the group’s day out. Next time I will be sure to fully gage the group’s navigational experience before setting on the hill, perhaps even getting them to make the route card with me, which in turn would allow me to assess their abilities and cover basics. I think I will also allow more time when writing the route card to allow for teaching time upon the hill and also perhaps change my leadership style to begin with a more authoritarian style which then changes into a participative/delegtive style nearing the end of the day.

References:

Mosston and Ashworth, (1986) The Spectrum of Teaching Styles. From Command to Discovery.White Plains; Longman.

Lewin, K, (1930) Leadership Styles. [online] Available: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_84.htm [date accessed: 9 December 2011]